New York Probate & Estate Litigation Blog

In December 2008, Surrogate - elect Nora Anderson was indicted for allegedly failing to properly report at least a quarter of a million dollars in campaign contributions. While Ms. Anderson contended that this money came from her own personal funds, prosecutors have alleged that the true source of the contributions was Seth Rubinstein, her eighty two year old law partner and mentor. According to theNew York Times, this case raises some unusual questions about what happens when funds claimed as gifts are utilized in a campaign.

Who'da thunk that we would be almost to April and a bill to re-institute the federal estate tax isn't even on the radar screens down in Washington?  The estates of those dying since January 1 owe no federal estate taxes and there is nothing on the horizon which indicates that this may change soon. In a nation that seems to prefer rich desserts to vegetables, rejoicing over this tax holiday may be a bit premature  --and our current estate tax situation certainly carries with it some unintended risks which should be of some concern.

Nassau County Surrogate John Riordan has found that an objectant in the Matter of the Estate of Willie Stewart,340211 successfully established that she and her son were distributees of the decedent, notwithstanding the fact that his death certificate provided otherwise. While there is a strong presumption as to the information contained in a death certificate, the court was clear to point out that while the document is proof of the cause of death stated therein, collateral facts which it contains may be subject to rebuttal.

In a special bulletin, the New York Times has just reported that Anthony D Marshall, son of the late socialite Brooke Astor has been sentenced to prison by a New York State Supreme Court Justice. Marshall was sentenced to one to three years in state prison by Justice A. Kirke Bartley Jr. after being convicted of stealing millions from his mother while she was alive. The case drew national attention first when it came to light that Marshall had kept his mother as a virtual prisoner, left to wallow in her own waste. The case focused attention on the growing problem of elder abuse, demonstrating that even super rich seniors such as Brooke Astor were subject to being severely mistreated by their own families. Marshall, who is 85 years old, has vowed to appeal the verdict so, given his advanced age and the legal firepower available to him, it is anyone's guess when he will actually report to start serving his sentence .

Your faithful lawblogger has recently prepared and given a podcast on  the new statutory Power of Attorney in effect here since September 1. It led me to further thoughts over just what some of the implications of this new power may pose for lawyers and clients alike. Three months after the effective date, it is clear that most of the profession has barely yawned but make no mistake about it, even though it is still evidently under the radar, a quiet revolution in an important segment of the practice of law has taken place.

The New York State Court of Appeals has just handed down a decision in The Matter of Hausman 2009 NY Slip Op 08854 which has upheld an Appellate Division decision setting aside a deed executed by the decedent in favor of an LLC formed by two of her children two weeks  before they actually filed the articles of organization with the secretary of state. The court ruled that because the  filing had not been made before the deed was executed, the corporation lacked the legal ability to take title to the property . The problem here that although the deed might have been ruled valid under the de facto corporations rule (which is what the Surrogate's Court did initially), there needed to have been some colorable attempt to comply with the statutes governing the organization of corporations before the deed was executed. Because the children of the decedent failed to submit any proof that they had at least tried to file the articles of organization before the execution of the deed, it was determined that the conveyance had failed and the deed was set aside with the property ending up in the residuary of the estate. Since the residuary was to be shared equally between her children , per stirpes, the property was shared with the minor grandchildren of the decedent who had survived two predeceased sons.  

Bronx County Surrogate Lee Holzman, in a case of first impression, has found that a decedent's posthumous non-marital son was entitled to posthumous DNA testing to determine his standing as a potential distributee of his late father. This decision on a motion in the Estate of Jermaine Michael Williams was rendered on December 3rd and was also reported in today's New York Post appears to be the first time a request for posthumous testing was made on behalf of a posthumous child.

As reported today by fellow lawblogger Karen Meckstroth in her Bay Area Wills, Trusts And Probate Report Blog  two Representatives have filed different bills to amend the Internal Revenue Code and to restore the estate tax which would otherwise terminate for one year in 2010. The bills proposed by Rep. Berkley (D.NY) and Rep. Schrader (D-OR) may each be viewed by clicking on the link provided by Ms. Meckstroth in her article. Both provide for an increase in the basic estate tax exemption to 5 million dollars. and for a reduction in the maximum estate tax and gift rate.

More than forty years after the death of Martin Luther King Jr., his children have resolved a bitter dispute over his multi million dollar estate. As reported by Bruce Carton in an article posted on Legal Blog Watch today, the lawsuits and countersuits stemming from charges of misuse of estate funds and seeking control over various assets have been settled, the family seeking to move on and preserve the legacy of their late father. An interesting sidelight of the story is that the estate retains a legal interest in the copyright of Dr. King's famous "I Have A Dream" speech that thrilled those present at the March on Washington in August 1963 . In 1999, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that  the "public  performance" of the speech, did not constitute "general publication' so as to cause the copyright to be forfeited.

Recently, your faithful lawblogger attended a seminar at the local bar association which was emceed by Nassau County Surrogate John Riordan. The surrogate took this opportunity to discuss  the recently decided case of Schoeps v. Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation which is reported at 884 NYS2d396. This First Department Appellate Division case is of interest on several levels. It deals with the attempt of  a German national to recover a multi-million dollar Picasso painting which he alleged was part of a huge art collection sold for a fraction of its true value when the Nazis were seizing Jewish assets in pre-war Germany.